Sophos XG Firewall and Cyberoam After Google published the vulnerability, the IPS Signature Team developed in-house signatures for four of the six CVEs. The patterns are now released in Signature pack version x.14.05. The following CVEs are addressed in this pattern update: CVE-2017-14491; CVE-2017-14493; CVE-2017-14495; CVE-2017-14496. A malicious website could execute code remotely in Sophos Connect Client before version 2.1. View Analysis Description Severity CVSS. We also display any CVSS information provided within the CVE List from the CNA. Note: NVD Analysts have published a CVSS score for this CVE based on publicly available information at the time of analysis.
- Sophos Cve Free
- See Full List On Cvedetails.com
- Sophos Vendor
- CVE-2012-0158: Anatomy Of A Prolific Exploit - Sophos
- Sophos Endpoint Cve
The cybersecurity meganews of the week, of course, is anything to do with HAFNIUM.
(To be clear, we’re going to write it as Hafnium from now on, as Microsoft does in its top-level incident disclosure document, so that it doesn’t look as though we’re shouting all the time.)
Strictly speaking, Hafnium is the name that Microsoft uses to denote a specific gang of cybercriminals, allegedly operating out of China via cloud services in the US.
According to Microsoft, these crooks are primarily interested in “exfiltrating information from a number of industry sectors, including infectious disease researchers, law firms, higher education institutions, defense contractors, policy think tanks and NGOs.”
The newsworthiness of this cybergang right now is that they have been connected with a number of brand new exploits recently patched in Microsoft Exchange.
These patches were deemed so critical that they came out the week before March 2021’s regular Patch Tuesday, instead of being made to wait for the rest of the month’s fixes.
These zero-day bugs can be used, amongst other things, to get access into, and to implant malware onto, Exchange systems, giving the crooks a sneaky entry pathway that avoids the need for cracked or guessed passwords.
The bugs, dubbed CVE-2021-26855, CVE-2021-26857, CVE-2021-26858 and CVE-2021-27065, present a number of different loopholes to attackers, including ways for cybercriminals to:
- Get authenticated access to an Exchange server without needing a password.
- Upgrade access privileges to the SYSTEM account.
- Write files to arbitrary locations on the server.
Unfortunately, the Hafnium crooks aren’t the only ones using these flaws at the moment – it seems that their techniques for exploiting the bugs are already widely known.
Turning write into execute
At this point, you might be wondering how attackers can turn a remote file write bug, where they can drop a file of their choice somewhere on your computer, into a remote code execution (RCE) bug, where they can reliably and immediately run the file they just created.
Note, of course, that the crooks don’t have to be able to run uploaded files right away in order to do serious damage.
It’s dangerous enough if they are able to leave malicious code where you might later launch it yourself by mistake, or if they can put it where it will run next time you reboot. (Cybercrooks aren’t always in a tearing hurry.)
Nevertheless, if cybercrooks can not only drop malware but also activate it whenever they want, they will do just that.
And in the recent Hafnium attacks, you’ve probably seen numerous mentions of the attackers using things known as webshells as a trick to launch files that they just infiltrated.
Although the words shell and webshell are widely used and at least loosely understood, we thought this would be a good opportunity to explain what these terms mean, how they work, and why they’re popular with crooks.
So, here goes.
Shells, also known as REPLs
To start with, we’re going to use a compact and stripped-down scripting language called Lua as an example. (Lua is a bit like Perl, Python, Ruby and their ilk, only much smaller.)
Like all those languages, it comes with a shell, often also referred to as a REPL, short for read-evaluate-print loop, which does what the name suggests.
Simply put, instead of running an existing program directly, a REPL typically prints a prompt and waits for you to type in a command or language statement, whereupon it executes the statement immediately, prints any results and goes back for more.
Sophos Cve Free
You can therefore work interactively, computing results, constructing new programs in memory and running them, building data structures, creating files, and even running external programs found elsewhere on your computer.
With a REPL or a shell you can quite literally make it all up as you go along, rather than being stuck with a program you created earlier.
In the Lua shell, the
> character is a prompt to indicate that the REPL is waiting for input, and the text after the prompt is what we typed in for the REPL to execute.
Lines that start without a
> are the printed output from the REPL:
If you could implant a REPL like this on a remote computer and then send it lines of text one at a time, you’ve have a very simple remote shell that you could use to do pretty much whatever you wanted – you wouldn’t be limited to a predetermined set of already-coded features.
As it happens, we started the Lua shell above from an even more general purpose Linux shell, namely Bash.
Where Lua favours the
> character for its prompt, Bash prefers
$, and Bash lets you run other programs directly, without needing special functions such as
io.popen() to open a sub-process:
You can see why crooks love to set up remote shells they can access later, because it gives them the manoeuvrability to develop their attacks as they go to work, instead of implanting a specific item of malware up front that isn’t as flexible.
Web content delivery
Here’s the thing: many, if not most, web servers use a scripting system, a bit like the Lua engine we tinkered with above, to help them generate and serve up content.
Usually, if you use your browser to ask for a file with a name such as
image.jpg, and such a file exists, the server will simply read that file into memory and send it back as the content of the requested page, along with the necessary HTTP (web protocol) headers.
These are known in the jargon as static pages, for obvious reasons: the file stored on the server is the content that gets served every time.
We set up a Windows IIS server and created this simple
hello.html file for it to use:
Visiting the relevant URL returns precisely the contents of that file, unmodified:
The upper pane shows how the page was rendered and the bottom pane shows the exact HTML source code that was served up.
Clearly, a crook who could write a new
hello.html file could cause real trouble for your server by causing you to serve up fake news, malware content, or bogus links, so a web server bug that allows arbitrary file writes always spells trouble.
But the side-effects of a bogus HTML file would, in general, be restricted to users who browsed to your site and who received the malicious content.
That HTML file couldn’t and wouldn’t directly affect the server itself.
Server side scripting
Life isn’t that simple, however, so let’s see what happens if we create a file called
See Full List On Cvedetails.com
(ASP is Windows jargon for Active Server Pages, though many other scriptable extensions are used, notably PHP files with the extension
.php on Unix and Linux servers, but the underlying run-time principles are the same.)
Here’s the HTML source code:
But this time, the page that’s served up looks like this:
.asp in the URL automatically tells the Windows IIS server not to read and return the
hello.asp file from the server directly, but to process it through the Windows ASP scripting service first.
Any regular HTML content is used unmodified, but the parts of the file between the special markers
%> are treated as miniature programs.
They’re actually executed as scripts on the server itself and the output of the script is inserted into the HTML file to create a dynamic page.
In the example above, the VBScript fragment
=Now() simply means to run the VBScript function
Now() to get the date and time as a text string, and return that string as the output.
So the HTML visible in the browser contains no trace of the server-side script, even though the page was dynamically generated on the server by running code stored inside the
Remote execution via the browser
What you’re looking at here is a really easy way for crooks who can write files to a web server, but not run them directly, to launch them indirectly instead.
If you can infiltrate a file with a scriptable extension into the right place on a web server, then you can visit later just using your browser and force the file to execute on the server, simply by referencing the URL that corresponds to the infiltrated file.
The browser essentially acts as a sort of “command console” that triggers the server to execute the script code.
All that’s necessary is for the script file to exist in one of the directories where the web server has been configured to check for content. (In a default installation of Windows IIS, that’s the folder
Malicious server-side side effects
Active Server Pages are safe enough if you only ever allow the server to access trusted script files designed to create legitimate content for the pages you’re intending to serve up.
But crooks can use ASP files without caring at all about the content they generate, concentrating on using the script to attack the server from the inside.
Here’s a simple example of using an implanted server-side script specifically to retrieve information about the server itself:
In the VBScript above, sandwiched between the special
%> markers, we placed code that uses the scripting engine inside the IIS browser to open a secondary scripting engine for our own use.
Then we ran the Windows command
whoami /user and collected the output, in order to find out what user account the server itself was using.
Basically, we’ve turned our browser into a web script console and achieved RCE:
To run the script, we just “launch” it on the server by putting its name into the URL in our browser.
We’re almost there.
We now have a way to force an infiltrated script file to run on a Windows IIS server, simply by using our browser.
But what if we want something more like the Lua REPL or the Bash console we showed earlier, where we don’t have to decide in advance which Windows commands we want to run?
It turns out that ASP-flavoured VBScript has a built-in way by which you can access any query parameters put on the end of a URL, i.e. anything that follows a
? character in the URL.
You can use the special variable
request.querystring, together with the
unescape() function to remove the special encoding that your browser uses for troublesome characters such as quotes, slashes, spaces and so on (the browser embeds these as hexadecimal codes).
So this server-side script…
…produces the output below in the browser:
You can see where we’re going with this, given that we can now not only trigger our script remotely, but also pass it run-time parameters that change its behaviour every time.
We’re going to use the text in the query string as the name of the Windows command we want to run, so that we can choose at run-time what we want our server-side script to do.
Now we have a generic webshell that isn’t hard-wired to specific commands:
dir into the URL to get a file listing off the server:
whoami /all to find out the permissions the IIS server is using:
Or exfiltrate files with the builtin
type function (like
cat on Unix), e.g. with the command
This means you don’t need telltale script commands such as
createobject('wscript.shell') in the webshell files themselves – you can pass in that part of the code at run time.
Note also that webshells don’t have to rely on commands or scripts added onto the end of URL iself.
Many webshells extract their command data from the body of the request transmitted by your browser, which is typically the sort of request generated when your browser submits a filled-in web form.
Technically, this means that a non-URL based webshell expects an HTTP
POST request instead of a
GET request, but the overall mechanism inside the webshell for running the submitted script or command is the same.
The reason for packaging webshell commands into the request body instead of the URL is that most web servers place a fairly strict limit on the longest URL they’ll accept, while no such limit exists on how much data you can upload as part of a form reply.
And there you have it.
That gives you a basic understanding of a webshell – it’s a tiny malicious addition to a web server’s set of files that can give crooks the ability to run commands of their choice, right on your web server, without needing to login first.
Indeed, the crooks can use an innocent-looking browser as a “console” program to control their shell remotely.
If you try these experiments for yourself, please don’t do this anywhere except at home, and don’t use your work computer in case something goes wrong. To install IIS and ASP on Windows 10, you can use Control Panel > Programs > Turn Windows features on or off and then select the components you need in the Internet Information Services section. Don’t forget to remove ASP and IIS when you’re done experimenting – you almost certainly don’t want those components installed and running on a regular computer that you use for other things.
CVE-2012-0158: Anatomy Of A Prolific Exploit - Sophos
What to do?
- Patch your Exchange servers. As we mentioned above, these security holes are already being actively exploited by more than just the Hafnium gang.
- Search your networks for indicators of compromise. Sophos has created a step-by-step guide to help you identify if you have been infiltrated by any of the webshells known to have been used in recent attacks:
- Ensure you’re protected against future attacks of this sort. For details of how Sophos protects against this threat, please read our update on Sophos News:
Sophos Endpoint Cve
By the way, if you need assistance in investigating a possible attack, we’re here to help: please contact the Sophos Managed Threat Response team.